Matt Got Hatemail!
I suppose it’s less actual mail and more of a comment, but the phrase still works. In a nutshell, I’ve received my first amount of hatelove resulting from something that I’ve published on this website. And since there has been little to write about on my end lately, I guess today is his lucky day for a response.
Back in June, I wrote an article for the Untrustworthy Name Contest, where I dissected an advertisement for a free film and gave a thoughtful yet slightly humorous breakdown of its absurdity. I gave no insight to the movie whatsoever except for the premise, youtube views, and number of dislikes. Then earlier today, three and a half months later, I received a comment on the article that, for once, wasn’t a spam bot. It is as follows:
Wow. You just dont get it. Satire. Irony. Look these words up, and apply them to your critique. And learn how to use a semicolon; you look like a douche when you misuse commas.
Well “ethan” (if that is your real name), where do I begin?
What was there to get? I was poking fun at an advertisement for a contest. I did not watch the movie itself, nor did I critique it, because it looked uninteresting. However, I found that the comparisons drawn out in the advertisement itself to be hilarious and appropriate for the contest at the time. As such, I came up with some stuff off the top of my head, presented my argument, added in a bit of humor, and then didn’t think much of it afterwards.
As it so happens, I know the definitions of satire and irony–thanks for your concern. You seem to not realize that these are the only flavors of comedy one can conceive. If you take a moment and do a bit of research, you’ll see that there are many different ways to be funny or entertaining. What I’m doing now, and what I did in that post, is what is known as observational comedy. I take a trivial thing like your comment or that advertisement and dissect it, inflate it, and make a big deal out of nothing. I’m making mountains out of molehills and having fun doing it. If I wanted to be ironic, then I’d either point out that you used a comma in an unnecessary way in your comment, or that you’re calling me out on grammar when you can’t even capitalize your own name. If I wanted to be satirical, I’d probably carry it out in a parody of your post, as to shame and ridicule you into being more well informed to make a change for the better. You might be able to argue that I’m doing that right now! But I’m not. I just seem to be doing the shaming and ridiculing part. What I’m trying to say is that I don’t need to write the way you want me to to “make a funny,” as some would put it.
Now if this were a formal paper or article–and I’m taking this time to remind you that this is not–then maybe I’d add in some more smatterings of semicolons. I might even try to condense some sentences down so I don’t have commas everywhere! But that’s just the way I write. A comma exists to connect sentences together or to separate ideas out, be it in the form of extra information or in the form of a list. Semicolons are also multi-purpose in that they can either separate lists with commas in them, or that they can connect disparate but related ideas; it’s pleasing in a literary sense but entirely unnecessary. I could have used a period in place of that semicolon and it would still be two complete sentences. In an informal environment, semicolon usage is the last thing on my mind.
Lastly, comma usage does not make one look like a douche. Being elitist makes you look like a douche. Not adding anything truly constructive to the conversation makes you look like a douche. Personal attacks on someone makes you look like a douche. If anything is going to make me a douche, it’d probably replying to your comment a manner such as this post. And if I wanted to turn the douche-o-meter up to 11, I would attack you on something completely irrelevant, like the fact that your email address is [REDACTED]@juno.[REDACTED]. People still use Juno? I remember when people like myself used Juno and Netzero: When they were still free internet services, everyone was running Windows 95, and I was just admitted into grade school. I can guarantee that I no longer check my first email address I’ve ever owned at mattman55@juno.com, and I haven’t ever checked since I got my nifty AOL internet account with my state-of-the-art 56k modem on my Windows ME computer. But I have since moved on to greener pastures, like post-Y2K technology. (That was satire, by the way)
The internet can be a cruel, unforgiving place. And if someone wants to call me a douche on a weak premise, I’ll give them a much stronger one on which their hatred can be based. Honestly, it sounds almost as if you were offended by my article; it’s almost as if you had a hand in the creation of the film itself, and you’re trying to defend it. But I digress. All I’m really doing is poking fun at you.
9 Responses to Matt Got Hatemail!
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007







Wow, Matt, way to take the high road; I would have gone with a solid “You look like a douche when you don’t put an apostrophe in ‘dont’”.
This would accomplish three things: one, point out the irony of someone criticizing your use of punctuation but not using his own correctly; two, it would effectively satire the original comment; and three it would use as many semicolons per capita as possible just to be an uber-dick about it.
But that’s me; your way certainly worked too!
That one was so obvious that I missed it. I also commend your superfluous yet effective use of semicolons; perhaps we should write like this more often.
So obvious as to be intentional? You are right though, of course, about everything. This is really a reaction to you dumping me for that excon with all the tatoos and the irresistible third nipple. I humbly apologize; it’s time I moved on
“You seem to not realize that these are the only flavors of comedy one can conceive.” Genius.
I like how your name is in all caps now. It really spices up the place ever since I dumped both you AND the ex-con. I’ve moved on to a clown named Albert, who has a heavy French accent, so it sounds like “Al-bear.” It’s adorable.
Damn. I wouldn’t usually use a semicolon; however, I think it’s a good beginning to this conversation. Has anyone actually watched the movie? I gotta agree, it picks up alot when the hookers show up. If my grammar or punctuation sucks, I do not care. I’m writing this on a
tiny ass phone.
Long and short of it, cock size immaterial, I got the humor out of it; but it still has as much irony as my shirt or any Alainis Morrset(sp?) song. Overall though, not bad except Once u get past the first 20-30 mins.
Hmm, this is very interesting, as it’s a very specific thing to be trolling. Ethan, you wouldn’t happen to be Ethan Norris who played Bill in the movie, would you? If it were, then I’m glad you’ve Googled your own movie to see what the press is saying.
And Roger, come on, you’re not really Roger are you? Internet says that you’re Angela Gant, who played both Jenifher and Lady Liberty. That really is quite the coincidence that we’d get two random people who might just happen to be in the same film commenting on it.
Hold on, let me get some popcorn before some more cast members show up.
Oh, are we making up names now? Call me “Sven”! I love the Sweedish flair!
If you read Matt’s original post, you’ll see he’s not making fun of your movie, he’s making fun of your MARKETING for the movie. The fact is, whether you were joking or not, it just wasn’t a compelling ad. You could take the absurdity up to 11 and say “BACKPAGE IS MORE FUN THAN BEING URINATED ON BY BADGERS.” Funny or not, you’re selling yourself short, which isn’t compelling marketing. Maybe you’re selling yourself short out of attempted comedy, maybe you’re selling yourself short because the movie really is that bad; I don’t know, I didn’t watch it. I wasn’t compelled to after seeing your ad.
Look on the bright side, though! That ad was SO BAD, it won the Eatie Award for Least Trustworthy Marketing. Feel free to now market yourself as an “Award Winning Film”, as long as you link back to our site.
[...] http://ynteonline.com/2011/10/11/matt-got-hatemail/ [...]